The AI agent wave has moved fast. In this HumBot Podcast episode featuring Victor (CTO & founder) and Steven (CRO) from Iris.ai, the discussion gets refreshingly concrete on what actually makes agentic AI succeed in enterprise environments: data readiness, context quality, evaluation, and the trust layer that turns demos into durable adoption.
The AI agent wave has moved fast. Last year, most enterprise conversations were dominated by "Let's run a pilot." This year, the tone has changed: "Can we actually deploy this… and trust it?"
In a HumBot Podcast episode featuring Victor (CTO & founder) and Steven (CRO) from Iris.ai, the discussion gets refreshingly concrete. Instead of repeating the usual agent hype, they go deep on what actually makes agentic AI succeed in enterprise environments: data readiness, context quality, evaluation, and the trust layer that turns demos into durable adoption.
Below is a full write-up of the most important ideas—especially useful if you're building an agentic product, selling into enterprise, or trying to scale from a single use case to an "AI factory" across teams.
Iris.ai started in 2015—long before today's generative AI boom. Victor explains that their original obsession is basically the same problem everyone is trying to solve now:
The world produces a massive amount of knowledge, but only a small fraction gets used in decision-making.
In research and academia, the pain is obvious: papers, experiments, and findings pile up faster than people can read them. But the enterprise version is even more expensive. If teams can't access the right knowledge at the right moment, decisions become ad-hoc, innovation slows, and critical work relies on partial context.
The key difference today isn't that the problem changed. It's that the enabling technology finally matured enough for real adoption. In Victor's words, the generative AI "revolution" opened doors to solve the same underlying challenge in a more scalable way.
Steven joins and makes a positioning point that's worth copying if you're in a crowded AI space:
They don't try to replace the data platform. They sit on top of it.
Think of it as a data-to-LLM foundation layer:
This positioning is important because most enterprise customers already have data warehouses, databases, lakes, governance tools, ETL pipelines, etc. They don't want another "replace everything" vendor. They want something that makes their existing data usable for agents—fast.
Steven references a stat often cited in enterprise AI discussions: many POCs fail. Whether the exact percentage varies by report, the pattern is real: enterprises get stuck in pilot loops.
Their take is blunt:
This is where Iris.ai's "unification" focus becomes a GTM weapon. If you can shorten the time-to-value by making the underlying data usable, you don't just win a POC—you earn the right to talk about production.
Victor shares one of the most practical insights in the whole conversation: enterprises have heterogeneous data, and LLMs don't treat all context equally.
Example:
What happens?
The model may overweight the long text and ignore the number—because the representation is disproportionate.
This sounds obvious, but it's exactly why so many "RAG wrappers" look good in controlled demos and fall apart in real environments. Iris.ai focuses on:
If you want an agent to act with confidence, "context injection" needs to be engineered—not improvised.
A major theme is that enterprise adoption is a function of trust.
Not brand trust. Not sales trust. Trust in reasoning + outputs. Trust in agentic actions.
Victor explains that the "trust layer" wasn't initially built as a product feature. It started as an internal necessity: if you're iterating on deep tech over years, you must know whether each change makes the system better or worse.
That mindset becomes a differentiator in the agentic era because most organizations still don't have strong answers to questions like:
They discuss building metrics like context grounding—measuring whether the output is actually derived from the provided enterprise sources rather than general model knowledge.
That's not just "nice to have." It's how you build confidence with regulated customers (finance, telco, manufacturing) where hallucination isn't "funny"—it's a risk event.
A big practical point: enterprise success isn't "we shipped you software."
It's product + expertise + process change, delivered together.
Steven breaks their co-creation into a few core stages:
Not just "what data do you have," but:
He gives an example: a finance team spending 40% of their time doing manual data chunking and insight compilation. The value is obvious—but only if you align it to business priorities and workflow realities.
POCs die when they're too isolated.
Instead, build a foundation that can expand across teams—so one use case can become a reusable capability for other departments.
This is the "AI factory" idea, but grounded:
Everyone can build a prototype agent.
Scaling requires repeatable quality measurement from both:
This is how you avoid the "demo trap."
Victor makes a point that's uncomfortable but true:
Most "AI agent adoption" today is still not pure. It's often "replace one step in a process."
But the bigger gains come when you redesign the process around AI, not around humans doing manual steps.
Steven gives a simple example in data validation:
Old world:
Agentic world:
That shift takes time. But it's where the compounding value comes from.
They call out the most common skeptical stakeholders:
The first line of defense. They ask:
Not always "anti-AI," but overloaded and realistic:
Steven's advice: you need internal champions across multiple functions. Otherwise, you can lose six months negotiating paperwork and alignment until the project dies.
Victor adds a sensitive point: domain experts can resist because of job insecurity, and in some cases can even sabotage experiments. His warning is practical:
You can't assume you'll replace experts quickly. Some enterprises remove experts too early, then later scramble to rehire.
A better model is:
They end with two complementary predictions:
Knowledge work will shift to:
We'll increasingly "pair" with multiple agents:
The future isn't "humans vs agents." It's humans with a toolkit of agents—and the winners will be the ones who can trust the toolkit.
If you're building an agentic product or selling into enterprise, here are the core lessons:
🎯 Stop treating "context" as a prompt problem. It's a data representation problem.
📊 Normalize heterogeneous enterprise data so the model can use it predictably.
🔄 Build an evaluation loop early—otherwise you can't scale reliably.
🔐 Trust is the real adoption barrier, and trust comes from measurable grounding and governance.
🤝 Co-create with customers: align goals, map reusable value, measure outcomes.
⚡ Don't just insert agents into old workflows—redesign workflows around agentic capabilities.
🏆 Win internally with champions across compliance, data, and business stakeholders.
Agentic AI in enterprise is entering its "adult phase." The demo era is fading, and the market is rewarding teams who can deliver certainty of outcomes.
The Iris.ai story is a good reminder that the real moat isn't flashy agents—it's the foundations underneath: data readiness, unified context, evaluation, governance, and a trust layer that turns experimentation into adoption.
If you're building in this space, that's the playbook.